Expanding upon the earlier discussion (linked above) concerning a mathematician’s paper that identified distinct patterns in papermilling—where potentially dubious behaviors were flagged by examining the publication records of two Highly Cited Researchers as illustrative examples—it is now essential to address a new study revealing substantial inflation of publication metrics across several universities.
This study, using data from Scopus and Web of Science, identified 80 universities whose research output grew by over 100% from 2019 to 2023. Notably, one university in Iraq saw a 1,500% increase, while another in Egypt experienced a nearly 1,000% rise in published papers https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/doi/10.1162/qss_a_00339/125732/Using-Bibliometrics-to-Detect-Questionable
While many in Western universities have used these findings to criticize institutions in Iraq and Egypt, this criticism reveals a clear hypocrisy, as it conveniently overlooks that the professor who authored 336 Scopus-indexed publications in a single year did so in Denmark, not in Iraq or Egypt. Similarly, the universities with the highest number of retracted papers are not in Iraq or Egypt, but in China and the United States
PS - It is worth recalling a warning I wrote a few years ago: "...if this becomes the norm in Western countries, third-world nations may be inclined to replicate these "successful" practices, cultivating their own super-scientists. Consequently, if an African super-scientist were to emerge with 10,000 or 20,000 publications at the summit of the publishing rankings, there would be little ground for criticism..." https://pacheco-torgal.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-many-papers-can-superscientist.html
