Musk, for instance, evokes Virgil’s Aeneid to liken space colonization to the journey of Trojan exiles landing on Italian shores, positioning himself as a visionary leader. Yet, his occasional confusion between the Odyssey and the Iliad suggests a superficial engagement with the texts he seeks to wield. Thiel, meanwhile, eagerly drapes himself in the mantle of classical mythology, invoking figures like Romulus and Remus to lend an air of historical inevitability to his vision of a technocracy ruled by an elite cadre of “highly competent men.” In his narrative, leadership is not merely a function of circumstance or politics but an almost sacred appointment reserved for those deemed intellectually superior. The dissonance between his rhetoric and reality is striking: while he crafts a tale of enlightened governance, the mechanisms he supports point instead to a world where authority is less about brilliance and more about who holds the keys to an omnipresent, unblinking apparatus of control. https://nul.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/2356/
Declaration of Competing Interests - In 2019 I exposed Peter Thiel’s blatant hypocrisy—most notably in a post critiquing his article "Competition Is for Losers," https://pacheco-torgal.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-numbers-of-admissions-in.html Back then, I concluded that post by referencing Professor Robert Reich. In that spirit, I’d like to take this opportunity to share some inspiring words from one of his recent posts, "Decency in the Time of Monsters," published yesterday, "We can maintain our ideals by demonstrating them whenever and wherever we can — showing courage in the face of fear, protecting the vulnerable in the face of brutality, practicing kindness in the face of cruelty, and preserving what is left of our democracy in the face of tyranny. We can maintain decency in the time of monsters. We must" https://robertreich.substack.com/p/surviving-in-a-time-of-monsters
PS - Ricardo Reis, a Portuguese professor at the London School of Economics, has recently evaluated Europe's optimal response to tariffs imposed by President Trump. He contends that implementing retaliatory tariffs would be counterproductive, stating, "Trump's tariffs are a tax that falls on American consumers, and it would be crazy to raise our own taxes whenever a country raises theirs." Professor Ricardo Reis advocates for maintaining zero tariffs as the most effective strategy. Alternatively, he suggests imposing taxes on U.S. social media companies—specifically targeting platforms like Musk's X—due to concerns about their detrimental effects on the quality of democracy and internal security in Europe.https://expresso.pt/opiniao/2025-02-13-a-tarifa-ideal-sobre-os-eua-c8c072f7
