quinta-feira, 9 de julho de 2026

Can the State Engineer Scientific Genius?

 

For more than three decades, Chinese scientists were taught that success meant publishing in the world's leading Western journals. A paper in Nature or Science was the passport to promotion, generous financial rewards, and international prestige. China learned from the world's foremost scientific institutions and, in many fields, has now surpassed them. Beijing is now rewriting the rules. It is reducing the weight of publications in Western journals when evaluating researchers, placing greater emphasis on high-quality domestic journals and research aligned with national priorities. At first glance, this may seem like little more than an administrative reform. In reality, it signals a profound strategic shift: China no longer accepts a scientific order that is designed, governed, and validated by the West. https://www.ft.com/content/64a811f1-b132-4211-8a8c-2252cf964039?

From Beijing's perspective, the strategy is rational. China is already the world's pre-eminent producer of global scientific publications, and, as I noted last month, Zhejiang University has now displaced Harvard from first place in the Nature Index Research Leaders rankings, the first time in more than a decade that Harvard has not led, an unquestionably symbolic shift, and the Stanford AI Index 2026 reports that China now decisively leads the world in AI publication volume and citations and accounts for roughly 70 per cent of all AI patents granted globally. It leads in numerous areas of engineering, advanced materials, and clean-energy technologies, combining massive research investment on a scale few democracies can match with an aggressive strategy to attract world-class scientists from the West.The next logical step is to build a scientific ecosystem that no longer depends on Western institutions for legitimacy, but instead defines its own standards of excellence and international influence.

Whether the West recognises it or not, the era of a single global scientific community may be drawing to a close. Science arguably humanity's most successful international enterprise is becoming another arena of strategic competition. Supply chains, semiconductor production and artificial intelligence have already fragmented. Scientific knowledge may be next. Europe, meanwhile, remains preoccupied with bureaucratic reforms, research assessment exercises and increasingly elaborate funding rules rearranging the furniture while China redesigns the architecture of global science.The irony borders on historical tragedy. For decades, Western universities welcomed China into the global scientific community, believing that openness would bind the world's scientists ever more closely together. Instead, that openness became the foundation of China's extraordinary scientific rise. Having mastered the rules of the existing system, Beijing is now increasingly confident that it can rewrite them and perhaps build a rival scientific order on its own terms, reshaping global science.

Declaration of competing interests - According to my Scopus record, 18% of my indexed publications were co-authored with Chinese scientists. This proportion is considerably higher than that of my fellow Portuguese Scopus Highly Cited Researchers https://pachecotorgal.com/2024/12/08/estarao-os-investigadores-mais-citados-de-portugal-a-aproveitar-devidamente-a-notavel-ascensao-da-ciencia-chinesa/

PS - Yet there is a paradox at the heart of China's strategy. Scientific leadership is not measured solely by the number of papers published, patents filed or billions invested. The greatest breakthroughs have historically emerged from environments where ideas circulate freely, orthodoxies are challenged and criticism is encouraged even when politically inconvenient. If China succeeds in creating a largely self-contained scientific ecosystem, it may also reduce its exposure to the international competition, scepticism and intellectual cross-fertilisation that have driven scientific revolutions for centuries. China may discover that building the world's largest scientific system is easier than building the world's most creative one.